Skip to content

Moritz

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Moritz supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Moritz commented  · 

    This is the comment i allready gave at the (sub/mini items within an Asset item) and the (Components) request

    i think it is all kind of the same problem and there is a lot more behind that.

    Hi, Actually i see a big demand and also some kind of confusion here.

    If i am right Bundles are made to make a collection of Items that are often rented out together so you be very quick with creating new orders.

    Many users actually use the Bundles to put items together that belong to each other wich is a totaly diffrent storry. For Example i have a sound and light company that has everything in cases. The contant of those always stay the same but i still want to have every item in there individually in my software.

    So actually there is missing some extra feature like nested items or what ever that groups assets and assetstock together and give you all the possebilitys that you have with regular assets.

    So i think actually many of us ore at least i use the bundle feature the wrong way. So if there would be something like that nested assets you would be able to

    -add them to bundles
    -verify a bunch of assets with one scan
    -have extra lables for those
    -do extra pricing
    -keep track of every tiny piece but still be able to work efficent.

    ...

    actually this would be very important for me and i can t do it with the bundles right now because i cant verify them through scanning and to scan everything individually would be thousands of scans for one event.

    I hope this will be added in the future.

  2. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Misty
    Thank you for the suggestion. This feature is on our radar for the future, but we do not have an ETA on it at the moment. But as we see more demand we’ll be sure to implement it.
    Let us know if you’ve any further questions.

    regards

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Moritz commented  · 

    This is the comment i allready gave at the (sub/mini items within an Asset item)
    i think it is kind of the same problem.

    Hi, Actually i see a big demand and also some kind of confusion here.

    If i am right Bundles are made to make a collection of Items that are often rented out together so you be very quick with creating new orders.

    Many users actually use the Bundles to put items together that belong to each other wich is a totaly diffrent storry. For Example i have a sound and light company that has everything in cases. The contant of those always stay the same but i still want to have every item in there individually in my software.

    So actually there is missing some extra feature like nested items or what ever that groups assets and assetstock together and give you all the possebilitys that you have with regular assets.

    So i think actually many of us ore at least i use the bundle feature the wrong way. So if there would be something like that nested assets you would be able to

    -add them to bundles
    -verify a bunch of assets with one scan
    -have extra lables for those
    -do extra pricing
    -keep track of every tiny piece but still be able to work efficent.

    ...

    actually this would be very important for me and i can t do it with the bundles right now because i cant verify them through scanning and to scan everything individually would be thousands of scans for one event.

    I hope this will be added in the future.

    Moritz supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Moritz commented  · 

    Hi,

    actully this is the same problem i allready saw and commented here pls check it out.

    (sub/mini items within an Asset item)

    it is really important and i think a lot of diffrent requests have kind of the same background.

  3. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Moritz commented  · 

    Hi, Actually i see a big demand and also some kind of confusion here.

    If i am right Bundles are made to make a collection of Items that are often rented out together so you be very quick with creating new orders.

    Many users actually use the Bundles to put items together that belong to each other wich is a totaly diffrent storry. For Example i have a sound and light company that has everything in cases. The contant of those always stay the same but i still want to have every item in there individually in my software.

    So actually there is missing some extra feature like nested items or what ever that groups assets and assetstock together and give you all the possebilitys that you have with regular assets.

    So i think actually many of us ore at least i use the bundle feature the wrong way. So if there would be something like that nested assets you would be able to

    -add them to bundles
    -verify a bunch of assets with one scan
    -have extra lables for those
    -do extra pricing
    -keep track of every tiny piece but still be able to work efficent.

    ...

    actually this would be very important for me and i can t do it with the bundles right now because i cant verify them through scanning and to scan everything individually would be thousands of scans for one event.

    I hope this will be added in the futer.

    Moritz supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Moritz supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base